On Disaster Nationalism and the Climate Crisis • Richard Seymour
In the wake of Donald Trump's stunning election victory, the march of "disaster nationalism" and the far right increasingly defines global climate politics.
In the wake of Donald Trump's stunning election victory, the march of "disaster nationalism" and the far right increasingly defines global climate politics.
Attempts to achieve security by trying to dominate nature are now backfiring on an unprecedented scale.
Insecure housing systems and growing environmental pressures concern the same buildings and the same people — and cannot be understood separately.
Past and present energy transitions have been motivated by the political and economic aims of industry and government. At the same time, they create new opportunities for labour mobilisation.
The "transition plans" of Western militaries are only viable responses to climate and ecological crisis when the causes of those crises are ignored. What is needed now is the drawdown, not the expansion, of military power.
Market-based climate policy — which strives to replace politics with “precision" — has failed. We need transformative, democratic solutions to address the climate crisis.
We urgently need to transform our relationship to the future, freeing it from the logics of capitalisation and its unequal treatment of time.
As the idea of the "just transition" has become mainstream, it has increasingly been co-opted. We need a transition away from both fossil fuels and from the extractive systems harming both people and planet.
Private investment cannot and should not drive decarbonisation. It's obvious: we need the state.